I saw a blog on the website www.creditandcollectionnews.com and would normally think I cannot believe what I am reading. But considering I know the collection agency business I can believe what I read. I read an article that nationwide credit posted and although quite disturbing because of there lies I am by no means surprized. Here is what Joel wrote in response to an article:
Dear Forbes and Mr. Hawkins, I am a very busy person and have never responded to a published article, but I feel compelled to comment on “How To Outsmart Your Debt Collector.” The attitude of, “What can I get away with, or out of because of a meaningless technicality?” is exactly what our society does not need. As the owner of an 18-year-old collection agency, we are swamped with hyper-technical lawsuits from “ambulance chasing” attorneys and debtors who are searching for a way to get out of paying a legitimately owed debt. The number of these suits has increased dramatically over the past few years, and the merit of these suits are typically laughable with absolutely no damage suffered by the debtor. The primary reason for this is that attorneys have become aware of the fact that a third-party debt collector cannot win when sued. It is simply a matter of how bad you are going to lose. Even if you win in court, you have lost big-time in that it will likely cost you tens of thousands of dollars to prove your case. Let’s see, settle for $4,000 even though you did nothing wrong and the charges against you were completely unreasonable or fabricated, or roll the dice to prove your innocence and spend $30,000 in the process. That is, $30,000 if you win, and by the way, you will have no meaningful chance of recovering any of your costs. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is over 30 years old and largely regulates communication pertaining to debt collecting. Keep in mind, when FDCPA was crafted over 30 years ago, answering machines were not even used, let alone faxing, e-mailing, texting, etc. … The FDCPA is in desperate need of being updated, and many attorneys take advantage of this fact. It is filled with vague language and gray areas that are ripe for misinterpretation, which is just wonderful for low-level plaintiff’s attorneys who are looking to make a quick buck at the expense of those performing an honest and needed service. Most third-party collectors go to great lengths and expense in an effort to comply with the FDCPA. Third-party collectors, at least the vast, vast majority of us, are simply attempting to get someone, the debtor, to make good on his/her legitimate obligation. What’s not good and noble about that? It seems that your article actually encourages bad behavior and “making out” on a trivial technicality. Just because you can get away with something does not make it right. And I doubt you would be so keen on technicalities if someone in your family was the victim of a violent crime and it was found that an arresting officer of the accused perpetrator mishandled two trivial words in reading Miranda rights to the accused. Maybe that headline could read, “How to Outsmart Your Arresting Officer After Committing a Violent Crime.” I give you the benefit of the doubt in that most people do not see things from our perspective; however, your article is disturbing, and it is never “smart” to devoid yourself of your rightful responsibilities. It is simply immoral! Thank you, Joel Lackey
President www.nationalcreditsystems.com
Needless to say I had to respond and here is what I responded with:
Joel,
I also feel very compelled to respond to your blog because you could not be further from the truth. However I am not surprized by your comments as I am very much aware of the training you give your collectors of how to violate consumers rights. I know this because I also used to work for your company. I am the one person that was a collector turned consumer advocate because I know that your tactics are wrong and illegal.
You know very well that your agency does in fact fabricate debt. You also know that your company is infamous for holding “paid” debt” for a few years then contacting the debtor again to get them to repay the same debt. If the awful collection industry was regulated and the attorney generals actually did their job there would be fewer collection agencies arising nationwide.
I do agree however that the FDCPA needs to be written for today’s standards. But prior to this doing any good we have to make the governing agencies do their job. I am in no way saying that people should get out of paying their debt for the most part but I am saying that their needs to be some “ethics” put into this rapacious industry. Debt collectors have rules they are to follow but they in no way do not.
I would like to give you the benefit of the doubt Joel but I cannot. I know what you and your comapny is about and how you work. I know first hand how you knowingly violate consumers rights and collect debt that is in no way legit. What you do and how you train your employees is the immoral part. So if you feel compelled to start making changes then please start by changing the way you run your business!!
Thank you,
Joey www.pervertedcredit.com
Amazing how these rapacious collection think. Let’s break the law and violate consumers rights then blame it on the consumers themselves